DS-0020Dissents · Constitutional · Wanted
The Minority in Abhiram Singh
Scope
Three judges on why "his religion" in election law refers only to the candidate, and why identity is a legitimate subject of political speech.
Authorities to start from
- Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen, (2017) 2 SCC 629 (Chandrachud, J., dissenting)
- Representation of the People Act, 1951, § 123(3)
These are places to start. Please check each one against the original before relying on it. Follow one to see which other entries start from it.
Nobody has written this entry yet. If you are a law student you can claim it. It helps to read how FPR works first.
Download the writer’s kit A Word file set up for this entry: the outline a Dissent follows, these authorities, and the length.